highly complex systems
Modeling the emergence of the ultra-complex system of the
human mind-based on the super-complex human organism- one needs to consider an associated
progression towards higher dimensional algebras
from the lower dimensions of human neural network dynamics and the simple algebra of physical dynamics, as shown in the following, essentially non-commutative categorical diagram.
One can represent by square
categorical diagrams the emergence of ultra-complex
dynamics from the super-complex dynamics of human organisms coupled via social interactions
in characteristic patterns represented by Rosetta biogroupoids, together with the complex-albeit inanimate-systems with `chaos' as discussed next.
Note that the above diagram
is indeed not `natural' (i.e. it is not commutative) for reasons
related to the emergence of the higher dimensions of the super-complex
(biological/organismic) and/or ultra-complex (psychological/neural network dynamic) levels in comparison with
the low dimensions of either simple (physical/classical) or complex (chaotic) dynamic systems.
An ultra-complex system represents the human mind and consciousness from the standpoint
of a categorical ontology
theory of levels as the highest level of complexity
that
emerged through biological and social coevolution over the last
million years on Earth.
Contributors to this entry (in most recent order):
As of this snapshot date, this entry was owned by bci1.