<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="1" id="1156">
 <title>Wave Mechanics: Wavenumber</title>
 <name>WaveMechanicsWavenumber</name>
 <created>2026-09-11 17:17:15</created>
 <modified>2026-09-11 17:17:15</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="1" name="bloftin"/>
 <modifier id="1" name="bloftin"/>
 <comment>removed double References heading</comment>
 <author id="1" name="bloftin"/>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="Wave Mechanics: Wavenumber" alias="Wavenumber"/>
	<synonym concept="Wave Mechanics: Wavenumber" alias="WM05"/>
 </synonyms>
 <keywords>
	<term>wave mechanics</term>
	<term>wavenumber</term>
	<term>angular wavenumber</term>
	<term>wavelength</term>
	<term>spatial phase</term>
	<term>spatial frequency</term>
	<term>radians per meter</term>
	<term>periodic function</term>
	<term>sinusoidal spatial pattern</term>
 </keywords>
 <preamble>% this is the default PhysicsLibrary preamble.  as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics).
% If you use \includegraphics{figure} with no file extension, PhysicsLibrary
% will prefer figure.png before falling back to figure.eps.
\usepackage{graphicx}
\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.png,.jpg,.jpeg,.pdf,.eps}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here</preamble>
 <content>\section*{Wave Mechanics: Wavenumber}

WM04 introduced a spatially periodic profile $u(x)$ and defined wavelength
$\lambda$ as the smallest positive distance over which the pattern repeats:

\begin{equation}
 u(x+\lambda)=u(x).
\end{equation}

For a sinusoidal spatial pattern we wrote

\begin{equation}
 u(x)=A\cos\left(2\pi\frac{x}{\lambda}\right).
\end{equation}

The factor

\begin{equation}
 \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}
\end{equation}

appears so often in wave mechanics that it is given its own symbol.  We define

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}.}
\end{equation}

The quantity $k$ is called the \emph{angular wavenumber}, or simply
\emph{wavenumber} in much of physics.  It measures how rapidly phase changes
with distance.  In this Wave Mechanics series, the symbol $k$ will always mean
this angular spatial rate.  This convention is standard in wave equations and
sinusoidal wave notation \cite{French1971,Crawford1968,OpenStax}.

WM05 is still a spatial-only lesson.  No pattern is assumed to move.  The
translating disturbance $F(x\mp ct)$ is introduced in WM06, and the full
sinusoidal traveling wave appears in WM07.

\section{From one wavelength to one angular cycle}

In WM02, one temporal cycle corresponded to an angular advance of $2\pi$
radians.  The same idea applies in space.

If position increases by one wavelength,

\begin{equation}
 \Delta x=\lambda,
\end{equation}

then the spatial pattern advances by one complete phase cycle,

\begin{equation}
 \Delta\theta=2\pi.
\end{equation}

Therefore the phase advance per unit distance is

\begin{equation}
 \frac{\Delta\theta}{\Delta x}
 =\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}.
\end{equation}

This is precisely the quantity we call $k$:

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}.}
\end{equation}

Equivalently,

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\lambda=\frac{2\pi}{k}.}
\end{equation}

\begin{center}
\includegraphics{WM05_fig01_wavelength_to_phase.png}

\vspace{0.45em}

\textbf{Figure.}
One wavelength $\lambda$ in space corresponds to one angular phase cycle of
$2\pi$.  Wavenumber $k$ measures how many radians of spatial phase are
accumulated per unit distance.
\end{center}

This is the spatial counterpart of angular frequency:

\begin{equation}
 \omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}.
\end{equation}

The parallel structure is

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c|c}
Temporal quantity &amp; Spatial quantity\\
\hline
period $T$ &amp; wavelength $\lambda$\\
angular frequency $\omega=2\pi/T$ &amp; wavenumber $k=2\pi/\lambda$\\
radians per second &amp; radians per meter\\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

This temporal--spatial symmetry is one of the main reasons angular frequency
and angular wavenumber are so useful in wave mechanics.

\section{Units of wavenumber}

Because wavelength has units of length,

\begin{equation}
 [k]=\frac{1}{\text{m}}.
\end{equation}

In physical discussion it is often more informative to say

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{k\text{ is measured in radians per meter}.}
\end{equation}

For example,

\begin{equation}
 k=8\,\text{rad/m}
\end{equation}

means that phase increases by $8$ radians for each meter of increasing $x$.

Formally, plane angle is a dimensionless quantity in SI and the radian is the
coherent unit used for plane angle \cite{NIST2001}.  Therefore the dimensional
unit of $k$ can be written simply as $\text{m}^{-1}$.  Keeping the word
``radian'' in the interpretation is nevertheless useful because it reminds us
that $k$ is an \emph{angular phase rate}, not merely a count of cycles per
meter.

\section{Spatial phase}

The sinusoidal spatial pattern can now be written more compactly as

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{u(x)=A\cos(kx+\phi).}
\end{equation}

The quantity

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\theta(x)=kx+\phi}
\end{equation}

is the \emph{spatial phase}.

The phase constant $\phi$ has the same meaning introduced in WM02 and WM03: it
specifies where in the cycle the pattern begins at the chosen origin $x=0$.
At $x=0$,

\begin{equation}
 \theta(0)=\phi.
\end{equation}

If $\phi=0$, the simple cosine profile begins at a maximum:

\begin{equation}
 u(0)=A.
\end{equation}

As $x$ increases, the term $kx$ advances the phase.

\section{How distance maps into phase}

For $\phi=0$, consider positions separated by fractions of one wavelength.
Using

\begin{equation}
 k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda},
\end{equation}

we obtain

\begin{align}
 x=0 &amp;\quad\Rightarrow\quad kx=0,\\
 x=\frac{\lambda}{4} &amp;\quad\Rightarrow\quad kx=\frac{\pi}{2},\\
 x=\frac{\lambda}{2} &amp;\quad\Rightarrow\quad kx=\pi,\\
 x=\frac{3\lambda}{4} &amp;\quad\Rightarrow\quad kx=\frac{3\pi}{2},\\
 x=\lambda &amp;\quad\Rightarrow\quad kx=2\pi.
\end{align}

\begin{center}
\includegraphics{WM05_fig03_spatial_phase_map.png}

\vspace{0.45em}

\textbf{Figure.}
A distance of one wavelength maps to a phase advance of $2\pi$.  Quarter-
wavelength steps correspond to phase advances of $\pi/2$.
\end{center}

This mapping is exactly analogous to the temporal relation

\begin{equation}
 \omega t=2\pi\frac{t}{T}.
\end{equation}

In space,

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{kx=2\pi\frac{x}{\lambda}.}
\end{equation}

\section{Short wavelength means large wavenumber}

The relation

\begin{equation}
 k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}
\end{equation}

shows that $k$ and $\lambda$ are inversely related.

If wavelength decreases, the pattern completes more phase cycles within the
same physical distance, so $k$ increases.  If wavelength increases, phase
accumulates more slowly with distance, so $k$ decreases.

\begin{center}
\includegraphics{WM05_fig02_compare_wavenumbers.png}

\vspace{0.45em}

\textbf{Figure.}
Two spatial sinusoids with equal amplitude but different wavenumbers.  The
larger wavenumber has the shorter wavelength and accumulates phase more rapidly
with distance.
\end{center}

Thus

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\text{short }\lambda\ \Longleftrightarrow\ \text{large }k}
\end{equation}

and

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\text{long }\lambda\ \Longleftrightarrow\ \text{small }k.}
\end{equation}

Wavenumber is therefore a useful measure of spatial oscillation density.

\section{Worked example 1: wavelength to wavenumber}

Suppose

\begin{equation}
 \lambda=0.80\,\text{m}.
\end{equation}

Then

\begin{align}
 k
 &amp;=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}\\
 &amp;=\frac{2\pi}{0.80\,\text{m}}\\
 &amp;\approx 7.85\,\text{rad/m}.
\end{align}

Hence

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{k\approx7.85\,\text{rad/m}.}
\end{equation}

A useful interpretation is that the spatial phase advances by about $7.85$
radians for each meter.

\section{Worked example 2: wavenumber to wavelength}

Suppose

\begin{equation}
 k=12.0\,\text{rad/m}.
\end{equation}

Using

\begin{equation}
 \lambda=\frac{2\pi}{k},
\end{equation}

we obtain

\begin{align}
 \lambda
 &amp;=\frac{2\pi}{12.0\,\text{m}^{-1}}\\
 &amp;\approx0.524\,\text{m}.
\end{align}

Therefore

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\lambda\approx0.524\,\text{m}.}
\end{equation}

\section{Worked example 3: reading a spatial sinusoid}

Suppose $x$ is measured in meters and

\begin{equation}
 u(x)=0.025\cos\left(4\pi x+\frac{\pi}{6}\right).
\end{equation}

Comparing with

\begin{equation}
 u(x)=A\cos(kx+\phi),
\end{equation}

we identify

\begin{align}
 A&amp;=0.025,\\
 k&amp;=4\pi\,\text{rad/m},\\
 \phi&amp;=\frac{\pi}{6}.
\end{align}

The wavelength is

\begin{align}
 \lambda
 &amp;=\frac{2\pi}{k}\\
 &amp;=\frac{2\pi}{4\pi\,\text{m}^{-1}}\\
 &amp;=0.50\,\text{m}.
\end{align}

Thus

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\lambda=0.50\,\text{m}.}
\end{equation}

The phase at the origin is $\pi/6$, so the pattern does not begin at the same
point in its cycle as a zero-phase cosine.

\section{The phase constant produces a spatial shift}

Consider

\begin{equation}
 u(x)=A\cos(kx+\phi).
\end{equation}

A cosine maximum occurs whenever the phase equals $2\pi n$.  For the maximum
nearest the origin, choose a convenient integer $n$ and solve

\begin{equation}
 kx+\phi=2\pi n.
\end{equation}

This gives

\begin{equation}
 x=\frac{2\pi n-\phi}{k}.
\end{equation}

For the branch with $n=0$,

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{x=-\frac{\phi}{k}.}
\end{equation}

Thus a positive phase constant shifts the corresponding cosine maximum toward
negative $x$.

\begin{center}
\includegraphics{WM05_fig04_phase_constant_shift.png}

\vspace{0.45em}

\textbf{Figure.}
Two spatial sinusoids with the same $A$ and $k$ but different phase constants.
The phase constant shifts the spatial pattern horizontally; it does not change
its wavelength.
\end{center}

This is the spatial counterpart of the time shift discussed in WM03.

\section{Angular wavenumber versus reciprocal wavelength}

The word \emph{wavenumber} is not used identically in every field.  In this
series,

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}}
\end{equation}

is the angular wavenumber used in wave mechanics.

A different quantity is the reciprocal wavelength

\begin{equation}
 \frac{1}{\lambda}.
\end{equation}

It counts spatial cycles per unit length rather than radians of phase per unit
length.  In spectroscopy, the unqualified term ``wavenumber'' commonly refers
to this reciprocal-wavelength quantity and is often expressed in
$\text{cm}^{-1}$ \cite{IUPAC2025}.

The two conventions differ by a factor of $2\pi$:

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{k=2\pi\left(\frac{1}{\lambda}\right).}
\end{equation}

This is analogous to the distinction between ordinary frequency $f$ and
angular frequency $\omega$:

\begin{equation}
 \omega=2\pi f.
\end{equation}

For clarity, this Wave Mechanics series will consistently use $k$ for angular
wavenumber.

\section{Dimensional check of the cosine argument}

The argument of a trigonometric function must represent a pure phase.  In

\begin{equation}
 \cos(kx+\phi),
\end{equation}

we have

\begin{equation}
 [k]=\text{m}^{-1},
 \qquad
 [x]=\text{m}.
\end{equation}

Therefore

\begin{equation}
 [kx]=1,
\end{equation}

with the phase interpreted in radians.  The phase constant $\phi$ is also an
angle, so the sum $kx+\phi$ is physically meaningful.

This dimensional check is valuable.  An expression such as

\begin{equation}
 \cos(k+x)
\end{equation}

would generally be meaningless because $k$ and $x$ have different dimensions.

\section{Wavenumber is not wave speed}

The symbol $k$ tells us how rapidly a phase pattern changes in space.  It does
not tell us how rapidly that pattern moves through space.

At this point in the series we still have only

\begin{equation}
 u=u(x).
\end{equation}

No time variable appears, so no propagation speed can yet be inferred.

Later, spatial phase $kx$ will be combined with temporal phase $\omega t$ in
an expression such as

\begin{equation}
 kx-\omega t+\phi.
\end{equation}

Only then will the relation between phase evolution in space and time lead to
wave speed.

\section{Common mistakes}

\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Mistake:} writing $k=1/\lambda$ in a wave-mechanics equation that uses angular phase.  In this series, $k=2\pi/\lambda$.

\item \textbf{Mistake:} treating a larger $k$ as a larger amplitude.  Wavenumber controls horizontal spatial repetition; amplitude controls vertical scale.

\item \textbf{Mistake:} forgetting that $kx$ must be a phase.  If $x$ is in meters, then $k$ must carry inverse-length units.

\item \textbf{Mistake:} confusing wavenumber $k$ with angular frequency $\omega$.  The former measures phase change per distance; the latter measures phase change per time.

\item \textbf{Mistake:} assuming $k$ alone gives a wave speed.  A spatial profile without time dependence does not specify propagation.

\item \textbf{Mistake:} confusing the symbol $k$ with a spring constant.  The same letter is used for different quantities in different contexts; units and equations identify which meaning is intended.
\end{itemize}

\section{Summary}

WM05 converts wavelength into an angular spatial rate.  The defining relation is

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda},}
\end{equation}

with inverse relation

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\lambda=\frac{2\pi}{k}.}
\end{equation}

The spatial sinusoid can therefore be written as

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{u(x)=A\cos(kx+\phi),}
\end{equation}

and its spatial phase is

\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\theta(x)=kx+\phi.}
\end{equation}

The central temporal--spatial analogy is

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c|c}
Temporal &amp; Spatial\\
\hline
$T$ &amp; $\lambda$\\
$f=1/T$ &amp; reciprocal wavelength $1/\lambda$\\
$\omega=2\pi/T$ &amp; $k=2\pi/\lambda$\\
$\omega t$ &amp; $kx$\\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

WM06 next replaces a fixed spatial profile with a translating disturbance and
shows why functions of the form $F(x-ct)$ and $F(x+ct)$ represent motion in
opposite directions.

\section*{References}

\begin{thebibliography}{9}

\bibitem{French1971}
A.~P. French,
\emph{Vibrations and Waves},
M.I.T. Introductory Physics Series,
W. W. Norton \&amp; Company, 1971.

\bibitem{Crawford1968}
Frank S. Crawford, Jr.,
\emph{Waves},
Berkeley Physics Course, Volume 3,
McGraw-Hill, 1968.

\bibitem{OpenStax}
Samuel J. Ling, Jeff Sanny, and William Moebs,
\emph{University Physics, Volume 1},
OpenStax, 2016,
Chapter 16, especially Section 16.2, ``Mathematics of Waves.''

\bibitem{NIST2001}
I. M. Mills, B. N. Taylor, and A. J. Thor,
``Definitions of the Units Radian, Neper, Bel, and Decibel,''
National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001.

\bibitem{IUPAC2025}
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry,
``wavenumber,''
\emph{Compendium of Chemical Terminology (the Gold Book)},
5th ed., online version 5.0.0, 2025,
doi:10.1351/goldbook.W06664.

\end{thebibliography}</content>
</record>
